Second Thoughts About ‘God In Me’

mary mary blackI am not going to lie: When I first heard Mary Mary’s “God In Me,” I loved it. It quickly became one of my favorite songs from their latest album, The Sound. It stayed in constant rotation in my personal playlist for about a month. But it wasn’t in heavy rotation because I thought it was profound. Not at all. It was more so because the song made me feel good. It has a catchy beat attached to words that are innocent enough that I could feel free to jam on it rather than “Blame It on the Alcohol.” But now, with the release of the single and the video on the airwaves and the Internet, my feelings have changed.

You see, upon the umpteenth listen, I realized that the song, while expertly produced for the ears of the Christian (or non-Christian) who isn’t sold on a traditional gospel or CCM sound, features lyrics that could be misconstrued as prosperity gospel. At first I thought I was reaching by drawing such a conclusion, but upon closer inspection of the song, I find that what sisters Erica Campbell and Tina Campbell claim as the “God In Me” could be confused as preaching a sort of prosperity gospel.

Verse 1: You’re so fly you’re so high
Everybody around you trying to figure out why
You’re so cool you win all the time
Everywhere you go man you get a lot of shine
You draw like a magnet better yet I have it
Everything you wear people say they gotta have it
From the sweat suit to the white tee to the Gucci
You can probably say people wanna get like me

Hook: But what they don’t know is when you go home
And get behind closed doors man you hit the floor
And what they can’t see is you’re on your knees
So the next time you get it just tell ’em

Verse 2: You see her style you think she nice
You look at her whip you say the whip tight
You look at her crib you thinks she’s paid
You look at her life you think she’s got it made
But everything she’s got the girl’s been given
She calls it a blessing but you call it living
When it comes to money she can be a hero
She writes them checks with a whole lot of zeros

Now the first verse is a little bit closer to what I’d expect someone to claim as evidence of the God in them. But it all goes downhill from there, as the duo trades inner-man change shown outward for the accumulation of goods as evidence of the God in them.

Side note: I will not take away from the fact that Mary Mary is giving it up to God and acknowledging that He is the source of all they have. That’s not what I take issue with. I take issue with the fact that it seems they are steering people toward a false understanding of God by boasting about prosperity as opposed to the real power of God in the believer’s life. This could present a problem for the babe in Christ who doesn’t have a deep knowledge of what God in them is supposed to look like. They may be deceived into thinking that the prayers of the righteous availeth much Gucci, nice whips, and lots of money. But in reality, “God in us” reveals so much more than the sum of our possessions. It’s dangerous to portray God to the world as one who does a good job of blessing us with things before you show the world how He broke you before He could give you any of these things.

I realize that this song has amazing crossover potential, since it sounds like any old secular song; and if you put the video on mute, you might think you were watching a secular video. But therein lies the problem. This video and song have potential to be played the world over, and it may be some people’s first time hearing about God. So you have to wonder, What will someone get after listening to this song? A healthy understanding of God, or a fractured one that highlights the part everyone can get excited about?

I worry that the sisters are not presenting a holistic view of what the God in a person looks like. They are not wrong to say that the God in them draws people to them, blesses them with fly clothes, hot whips, money, and cool friends, but God is so much more than that. I want people to see that He is to be worshiped not for the things He gives us but for who He is. And really, if we are going to worship Him for giving us something, let’s worship Him for Jesus.

In the end, I respect Mary Mary for making music that bridges the gap. I am a fan. Last year, I gave The Sound high marks in an earlier UrbanFaith review. I just want these talented young women to make sure they are being more careful with their theology when trying to be “all things to all men.” Like many of their colleagues in the industry, they need to be ever cognizant of the fact that everything they do as gospel artists must communicate biblical truth in a way that does not mislead unwitting fans or misrepresent a holy God.

About the author, Nicole Symmonds

Nicole Symmonds is a newly-minted Master of Divinity joining the droves of people with MDiv behind their name who aren’t planning to minister—at least not from behind a pulpit. She views writing as a type of ministry and is happy to have the opportunity to return to her first vocational love while she continues to discern God's call upon her life. Nicole currently resides in Atlanta where she works as a freelance writer and journalist focusing on issues in religion and spirituality in the black experience, sexuality and spirituality, and pop culture and entertainment.
  1. thanks for stepping up with this second look…
    This song bothered me too, but it was mostly because I thought it was too naked an attempt to get crossover status (and probably it didn’t help that I was unfamiliar with, and subsequently unimpressed by, the rapper David Banner).
    I too am a fan of Mary Mary and, overall, I was very impressed by “The Sound” (especially the title track, and “Dirt” … that’s my bump right there).
    But we need to continue to hold our stars in the media accountable if it seems like they’re heading too far askew. I’m still hoping that someone prominent and with significant influence can help Canton Jones stop preaching the prosperity gospel with his music.
    (and by the way, I’m still a fan of CJ… I don’t think prosperity is ALL he sings about… but too much of it is, IMO.)

  2. I have honestly been concerned with Mary Mary’s transformation.
    In a recent interview with NPR ( Mary Mary’s defended the tight fitting outfits they are wearing on their cover by suggesting that,”Truth be known, I’m a woman. I would love to be appealing to men. It is not my endeavor [to] entice, to cause anyone to lust.”
    I worry that the sisters are trying too hard to be crossover artist rather than good artists.

  3. I take issue with the fact that it seems they are steering people toward a false understanding of God by boasting about prosperity as opposed to the real power of God in the believer’s life.
    I love this song and I love the message. Everything I have is because of the God I serve. My car, the house, the job and the money I have are because of him. These things are not because I am so smart or because I am better than anyone else. It is because I serve a God that said in his word that I was to be fruitful and multiply, not meaning just having many children. So this song does show the real power of God or I should say one of the many ways God is so powerful. To view the full power of God listen to the entire album which shows a fuller view.
    I do not serve a poor God. Everything he has done including creating the world I live in has been done with greatness and he has provided me with more than enough, so why wouldn’t I tell people all these things they see are because of the “God In Me”.
    On a final note I believe the Christian church has a spirit of poorness in it that needs to be broken and hopefully that song begins to break that yoke.

  4. best for you , just clicks away for less

  5. Isn’t this criticism exactly what the song is about- what the world sees vs. what’s actually there? Just because Mary Mary don’t limit their gospel to the church or church people doesn’t mean they’ve forgotten who they serve. They’re just smart enough to know that God’s message can travel anywhere- the church, the street, the home, the club- anywhere. The gospel can never be limited and its about time for critics to stop and think about what they are criticizing.