Churchy Fallacies Are Drivin’ Me ‘Crae

Lecrae is being attacked for his recent secular appearances. But the problem runs much deeper than one rapper-who’s-a-Christian.

Single by Pete Rock, Lecrae, and Rapsody – Be Inspired

The latest shot from the naysayer crowd (I would call them “haters” but that’s played, and plus, I’m an adult) at Reach Records founder and holy hip-hop superstar Lecrae, came from Meeke Addison of Urban Family Communications. In her recent article, “Is It Time for the Church to Reevaluate Lecrae?” her argument is highlighted in the first paragraph:

If Lecrae were looking at himself objectively, even he would caution church leaders considering “bringing him in.” In his attempt to reach and engage today’s hip hop culture, the popular rapper has made some decisions that are destructive to the souls of men. Lecrae may be able to work with secular artists and not be influenced by their music content – but our youth are not.

Meeke Addison continues on, relating a story of when she was first impressed by Lecrae and his wife at a concert in 2005, and contrasts his prior, sold-out-and-on-fire-for-the-Lord stance with his current stance, which she deems as a slippery slope of compromise with wickedness. Addison infers several conclusions from Lecrae’s recent collaborations, among them are the following:

Lecrae believes that “being a Christian is unfruitful when attempting to reach the lost; you’ll be far more effective as a positive person.”

His collaborations with rappers like Pete Rock, David Banner and Paul Wall are implicit endorsements of all of their music and lifestyles ( “he’s telling our youth Kendrick Lamar is good for their soul”).

These collaborations, combined with public comments she interprets as downplaying his faith, mean that Lecrae is no longer unashamed of the gospel – the crux of his “11Six” identity. 

Given the way that the church supported Lecrae during his upward trajectory, this reversal is not simply embarrassing to the church, but is tantamount to outright betrayal.

It sends the message that musical success cannot be found within the Christian market because Christian music is known to be mediocre.

Of these five assertions, the only one that even holds a little bit of water in my book is the last one, but they all stem from a fundamental assumption that I refer to as the “Sentient Song Fallacy,” which I learned about from the seminal work on Christian music ministry At the Crossroads, by legendary guitarist Charlie Peacock. Essentially, the fallacy is to believe that a song can be Christian. It’s not that Christians can’t make music that reflects our belief – obviously we can and often do. But a song itself cannot be “Christian” in the way that a person can, because a song is an inanimate object. It is incapable of coming to a saving relationship with Jesus Christ. It’s incapable of any sentient behavior at all, it’s just a song.

I believe this fallacy persists because of two important, symbiotic reasons.

First, it persists because of market forces. There are plenty of record labels who were started by Christians but have long since been bought out by multinational media conglomerates. These music companies have sustained a profitable business by selling music by Christians, to Christians.

But the market forces wouldn’t exist without evangelical gatekeepers, parents, church and community leaders, sometimes even political figures, who make it their business to decide which artists they will support and why. Sometimes, it’s just as simple as parents wanting to have music that they can play for their children that will not have profanity. But whatever the reasoning, evangelical gatekeepers depend on the machinery of the Christian music industry to help identify which songs and artists are worthy of their support. Which is understandable, especially if you’re talking about hip-hop.

There are obviously many contemporary hip-hop artists on urban radio stations and cable TV shows that no self-respecting parent would ever want influencing their child. And there are so many artists and groups, it can be difficult to keep track. It’s much easier to say, “well, if they’re on this record label, they’re probably safe.” Or, “if they record with this person, they’re probably safe.” Or, “if they performed at this event, sponsored by this radio station, they’re probably safe.” After all, there’s a reason why all those The Fish stations use the slogan “safe for the whole family.”

But this approach is flawed, for a bunch of reasons. Yolanda Adams, Marvin Winans and Fred Hammond are three of the biggest names in gospel music, with careers spanning over 20 years of music performance. Also, all three have gone through very public divorces. That may not disqualify them from ministry altogether, but I’m not sure I’d ask any of them to present their teachings on marriage.

My point is that artists are people, and people are more complicated than just what we can ascertain by putting them in boxes labeled “Christian” or “non-Christian.” Furthermore, there are songs by artists who profess to be Christians that might still contain elements of errant, heretical doctrine. On the flipside, there are songs by “secular” artists that may communicate certain Biblical truths very clearly, even though those artists may not publicly profess to be Christians.

So sometimes deciding who should be “in” and who should be “out” can be somewhat arbitrary, and it drives me crazy. This artist spent years on a Christian label and had a substance abuse problems. But this artist never recorded on a Christian label, yet released an album with a really compelling depiction of the processes of salvation and sanctification. Who should be in, and who should be out?

If your answer is, “it’s complicated,” then that’s my point. The Sentient Song Fallacy is bad because it enables lazy analysis and rewards shallow theology. If you’re a parent, you wouldn’t let some middle manager dictate what your kids eat for breakfast, right? So why let them decide what music they listen to?

As for Addison’s inferences, let me address them one by one:

Why is being a Christian mutually exclusive from being “positive”? Last time I checked, the fruit of the Spirit included love, joy, peace, patience … those all sound positive to me.

If we’re disqualifying Christian artists on the basis of their collaborations with people who do sinful things, I hope you stopped listening to The Winans after they collaborated with R. Kelly.

If you actually listen to the verse Lecrae does on the Pete Rock and Rapsody track, it seems pretty clear that he’s not ashamed to rep Christ in the general market.

Are we to assume that the Great Commission doesn’t apply to rappers? Or is it only acceptable for unsaved people to hear the gospel in a church?

First, I don’t think Lecrae thinks this. But even if he did, it would only be true to the extent that church people continue to insist their artists operate in a smaller, parallel music market marked “Christians only.” When Christ-followers who are talented, focused musicians tend to put their music in the general market, they often do just fine. Christian music isn’t the problem, it’s the marketing of Christian music.

To Meeke Addison, or anyone else who has a problem with Lecrae – please don’t think I’m just saying this because I’m a fan. On a basic level, I appreciate that you want to keep someone like Lecrae accountable. I just wish you didn’t operate with these assumptions, because we can’t have a real discussion about the music unless we address them.

Without that, we’ll just talk in circles, and that drives me crazy.

About the author, Jelani Greenidge

Jelani Greenidge is an UrbanFaith columnist based in Portland, Oregon. A writer and musician, he blogs at
  1. Pingback: Jelani Greenidge of Urban Faith Responds to Meeke Addison’s “Attack” on Lecrae | BCNN1 – Black Christian News Network

  2. Pingback: Churchy Fallacies Are Drivin' Me 'Crae | Tickets for you

  3. One thing about God, He always has a new way of innovating the message of salvation to reach others. As Christians, I think that many of us are expecting to see God do the same ol’ things that He has done when it comes to salvatiion; this way of thinking limits him. In concerns of Lecrae collaborating with wordly artists, I do believe that this is a more effective way that God has lead him to get the message to the masses .. and to those wordly artists. To see someone on their level represent Christ, not change who they are, and still make the money that they make is AWESOME! I will stay a Lecrae fan and am excited on the anticipation of what God will have him to do next .
    Thank you for your time ♥

    • there are many typos, i was rushing -_-

    • Yes I agree. Lecrae’s lyrics are very sound from a Christian standpoint and he offers the message in a unique, refreshing way. I will continue to support his music because I continue to be inspired by it as a fellow Christian and artist myself.

    • yes girl!
      took the words out of my mouth!

  4. Pingback: Re-Digest Highlights Across the Web (02-08-14) | RAANetwork

  5. I find this article quite laughable at best. A pastor (Rodney Willis) gets fired for attending a Rick Ross concert, and yet some people in the body of Christ have actually attempted to justify his actions while condemning those of the church of which he pastored. Yet still the church will question the motives of a Christian rap artist. Did anyone question “Mary Mary” when they recorded a song with David Banner? Or was that ok. If so, why?

  6. I think that we have to be renewed in our minds constantly about the different facades of christians. No one christian is alike and thats the beauty of being part of the body of Christ. Lecrae is anoited to reach the individuals that God has anoited them to have an impact on. Some people are not going to accept the tradional christian of the traditional church. They want people whose life is evidence of Christ not clothing and Jesus pieces.

  7. I genuinely enjoy studying on this website, it holds good content. Never fight an inanimate object. by P. J. O’Rourke. bbdkgeddkccf

  8. I have always been a fan of Lacrae and most of all a huge fool for Jesus. We need to take an example from him. Jesus never preached to the saved, hr preached to the unsaved. For me, Lacrae does a gud job in reminding us Christians about who we are in Christ and just refreshing the soul when it gets weary. But it think his major role as well as our (Christians) role is to preach to the unsaved and not to the choir. And if that means going into the secular world, so be it. It is nt in our place to judge the actions of man. If Lacrae is wrong then God will definitely do something about it. We, as his brothers and sisters on Christ just need to shower him with prayers.

  9. I’ve been a fan of crea from the first time i heard his song(s).. one thing i know is that the call of GOD is always personal,, even though some things he’s saying and the steps he’s taking is not really what we can grasp or comprehend or understand,, i still chose to believe he’s still on track with his assignment,,, i leave him to time..(time proves all things) and let GOD his employer be the judge…
    I love the hand of GOD in his life and what GOD is doing through him..
    May GOD bless and help him, give him the wisdom and grace to stand right at all times no matter were he finds himself,, and to remain unashamed…